The forseeable future

My next research is on improving contrast in machine vision as it relates to automated medical imaging when using sonographic imaging. I have some ideas looking at sounds as it relates to tissue density. Since all things that are living are animate producing energy, all of these energies exist as radiating sound. As a physics student quoted mc hammer and said to a professor "you can't touch this". We can experiece the force fields surrounding each object. Some early scientists said that bats made sounds that bounced off objects. And this is particurally interesting because we now know that with noise cancelling headphones energy can be added or subtracted from the wave's amplitude making it in a spectrum that a bat can hear. An interesting proof of concept is a motion detector which can sense heat such as a passive infrared detector. Rather than an array of microphones my approach levererages the formation of patterns to learn what type of sounds to expect in progression through software audio filters. As math professors used to tell us, nothing is continuous but discrete in terms of energy pulses. Our brain just connects through sampling and tries to make up for its lack of perception capacity to think of something as continuous. Even light is susceptible to waves and quantum mechanics. We now know there is confusion because thus not only includes the third demention but the fourth demention as well. The best they can do is a group of circles circling around each other for modeling purposes. It is particurally interesting shining a lazer at a boom box speaker. Scientists argue that light waves are transverse while sound waves are longitudinal. Light create heat when coming into contact with objects. Would sound waves also sound waves be capable of generating heat if the oscilations were closer together meaning it carried more energy. Were slowed down it would have a similar effect as seen with thunder and lightening where thunder takes more time than light to be perceived. In order for a source to have more than one wave it seems as though each type of wave would need its own source emitter. However, it can be deduced that this is not always the case. It is more reasonable to say that the intensity of light decreases as a square proportion into square distance. This means as wave bounces off objects it would decrease the focused energy so it turns from a light wave to a sound wave when light reflects and refracts off objects. I think that it is dair to say that light is a sound wave except that light has a greater frequency so that it affects the centripetal motion so that the sound wave appears to be under greater influence of gravitational force of surrounding objects. Consider a solar storms which can have a flame burst which can be perceived by audio equipment. Radio telescopes can detect planets becuase they operate in a different spectrum and serve as a inspiration for this project.